Post by account_disabled on Feb 20, 2024 5:15:33 GMT -5
There is a lot of documentation on the matter and therefore my position is very clear in this regard. And the fact is that in the fascism of the germ of what we call historical fascism was not found although already in July an armed organization of fascist squads established in Trieste attacked and burned the Narodni Dom the headquarters of the organizations of the Slavic minority.
However this border fascism did not constitute a mass movement. This mass fascism was born in it was organized militarily in the squad then it took the structure of a militia party the National Fascist Party it dedicated itself to destroying Russia Mobile Number List organizations of the proletariat and proposed and achieved the conquest of power with the March on Rome. On the other hand th century fascism did not seek to establish a dictatorship he used violence but not with the objective of systematically destroying proletarian organizations It did not plan like the squadron fascism born in a revolutionary insurrection to conquer power and it did not want to become a political party to the point that it declared itself nonpartisan. In their view Mussolini did not create fascism but fascism created Mussolini.
How did he manage to take over the leadership of that movement and what tensions did he experience in that process First we must point out that Mussolini came to be recognized as the leader of fascism but never officially since he was never the general secretary of the Combat Fascios nor the general secretary of the National Fascist Party that was born in November . In August In after the growth of the squad as a mass movement Mussolini thought that by claiming the paternity of fascism he could impose his will even going so far as to promote a pacification pact with the Socialist Party and the General Confederation of Labor.